The poetry of Jorie Graham frequently necessitates an examination of the exigencies of human perception. Recognized as a central figure among the American post-war generation, Graham has consistently tested the boundaries of the lyric form. A Pulitzer Prize winner and a MacArthur Fellow, she taught at Harvard University as the Boylston Professor of Rhetoric and Oratory, the first woman to hold a position previously occupied by writers including Seamus Heaney and John Quincy Adams.
Born in New York City and raised in Italy and France, Graham’s trilingual background and her early immersion in European culture inform the philosophical inquiries present in her verse. Influenced heavily by modernists, including one of my favorites, Wallace Stevens, her work consistently positions the poetic line as a fundamental unit of sense. As Calvin Bedient has observed, Graham is “never less than in dialogue with everything. She is the world champion at shot-putting the great questions. It hardly matters what the title is: the subject itself is always ‘the outermost question being asked me by the World today.’ What counts is the hope in the questioning itself, not the answers.” This continuous dialogue finds a complex articulation in her poem, “I’m Reading Your Mind.”
I’m Reading Your Mind
By Jorie Graham
here. Have been for centuries. No, longer. Everything already has
been. It’s not a reasonable place, this continuum between us, and yet
here again I put the olive trees in, turn the whole hill-sweeping grove down, its
mile-long headfuls of leaves upswept so the whole valley shivers its windy silvers,
watery … A strange heat is upon us. Again. That was you thinking that. I suggested it.
Maybe the wind did. We both put in the horizon line now, the great loneliness, its
grip, chaos recessed but still there. After finitude you shall keep coming toward me
it whines, whitish with non-disappearance. We feel the same about this. The same
what? We feel is there more. That’s the default. We want to live with the unknown in
front of us. Receding, always receding. A vanishing moving over it all. A sleepy
vacancy. It’s the sky, yes, but also this thinking. As from the start, again, here I am,
a mind alone in the fields. The sheep riding and falling the slants of earth. The
sleepiness a no-good god come to assume we are halfwits, tending, sleepy, the
animals gurgling and trampling, thistle-choked, stinging. A dove on a stone. No sky
to speak of, the god lingers, it wants to retire, it thinks this is endgame, what
could we be mist about to dry off, light about to wipe a wall for no reason, that
random. This must have been way BC. Or is it 1944. Surely in 2044 we shall be
standing in the field again, tending, waiting to surprise the god who thinks he knows
what he’s made. Well no. He does not know. We might be a small cavity but it
guards a vast hungry how bad does that hurt you, fancy maker you have no idea
what we turned our back on to come be in this field of earth and tend yes tend
these flocks of minutes, whispering till the timelessness in us is wrung dry and we
are heavied with endgame. Have I mentioned the soul. How we know you hustled
that in, staining all this flesh with it, rubbing and swirling it all over inside with
your god-cloth. Rinse. Repeat. Get this here with this staff which soon I shall turn
into a pen again brilliantly negligent, diligent, inside all this self truly formless I
hear the laughter of the irrigation ditch I’ve made, I see the dry field blonde-up and
green, day smacks its lips, they are back, the inventors, they are going to do it
again, sprinkle-seed, joker rain coming to loosen it all. How many lives will we be
given, how many will we trade in for this it comes in bushels, grams, inches, notes,
crows watch over it all as they always have, come back from the end of time to caw
it into its redo again. Cherish us. Will not stop. Nothing to show for it but doing. The
flock runs across as the dog chases and I walk slowly. I admire what I own what I am
and I think the night is nothing, the stars click their ascent, I feel it rise in me, the
word, I feel the skull beneath this skin, I feel the skin slick and shine and hide the
skull and it is from there that it rises now, I taste it before I say it, this song.
The Syntactic Threshold and Narrative Voice
The structural relationship between writer and reader is established at the initiation of the text. The title of the piece does not function just as a header; it rolls into the first line of the poem. This linguistic continuation creates an immediate conversational engagement. Weston Cutter has noted that Graham writes “ultimately for connection,” seeking to enact a contract where “the feeling of her poetry is seismic for the ways in which she tries so hard to get you to feel and understand.”
The speaker’s voice consolidates her position when she asserts, “Have been for centuries. No, longer.” The interjection “No, longer” sets a tone that shifts the speaker away from a localized human subjectivity toward a more extensive category of consciousness. The utterance suggests the voice of a collective psychic record surveying a long historical continuum, establishing a firm, commanding voice for the poem’s speaker from the outset.
Conceptual Frameworks and Tactile Imagery
A recurring element of Graham’s poetics, particularly evident following the publication of her book The End of Beauty, involves integrating philosophical discursiveness into the lyric space. In this text, she blends conceptual frameworks with grounding tactile imagery. The reader encounters abstract phrases like “this continuum between us” alongside “non-disappearance.”
Instead of allowing the text to remain entirely theoretical, Graham anchors these concepts with physical interventions. The speaker claims to “put the olive trees in,” constructing a vivid landscape where “the whole valley shivers its windy silvers.” This juxtaposition sustains a tension between high metaphysical inquiry and the tangible reality of a field described as “thistle-choked” and “stinging.”
The Metaphysical and Subversive Posture
As the poem traverses historical markers, moving from “way BC” to 1944 and anticipating 2044, it adopts a posture that interrogates the dynamic between humanity and the divine. The text leans into the metaphysical by introducing a creator figure, yet it subverts reverence with a colloquial dismissal. The divine is characterized as a “sleepiness a no-good god come to assume we are halfwits.” What brilliance! Few poets can successfully intermingle humor and a serious examination of theological positions, and not pull us out of the work. Here she actually draws us in more deeply into the magic of her work.
The speaker addresses the “fancy maker” directly, suggesting the creator fundamentally misunderstands the depth of human experience. The interpolation of the soul is framed not as a sacred blessing but as a possibly unwanted imposition, described as “staining all this flesh with it, rubbing and swirling it all over inside with / your god-cloth. Rinse. Repeat.” By depicting sacred creation in the lexicon of domestic chores, the speaker claims an autonomous stance in relation to the cosmos.
Mechanics of Perception
The text’s pacing depends upon specific formal techniques. Enjambment is a poetic device in which a sentence or phrase carries over a line break without a major pause or punctuation mark. When Graham writes “Everything already has / been,” she utilizes enjambment to temporally stretch the concept of existence across the blank space of the line ending.
Furthermore, the poem frequently relies on the caesura. A caesura is a metrical pause or break in a line of verse occurring where the natural rhythm of speech dictates a halt. In the sequence “watery … A strange heat is upon us. Again. That was you thinking that,” the punctuation generates multiple caesuras, creating abrupt stops that simulate the fragmented processing of consciousness.
The poet also delivers a very memorable personification: by stating that “day smacks its lips,” the poet characterizes time as a sentient, consuming entity.
The Somatic Shift
In a discussion with The Paris Review, Graham suggested that a poem “is a private story, after all, no matter how apparently public,” positioning the reader as someone “overhearing a confession.” The concluding lines of “I’m Reading Your Mind” execute a marked shift from the preceding cosmic landscape toward an intensely localized physical interiority.
After managing “these flocks of minutes” across centuries, the focus narrows abruptly. The metaphysical expanse recedes, replaced by the somatic reality of the speaker: “I feel the skull beneath this skin, I feel the skin slick and shine and hide the / skull and it is from there that it rises now, I taste it before I say it, this song.” The poem transitions from the abstraction of the rising word to the physiological sensation of language in the mouth. This redirection implies that philosophical scale must ultimately yield to the urgent, physical exigencies of the human body.
Tasting the Infinite: The Nature of our Physical World
Ultimately, Graham constructs a landscape where the sweeping abstractions of time and history find themselves inexorably anchored to the physical body. By rejecting the sterility of pure philosophy, she grounds her cosmic inquiry in the dirt of a literal field and the physiological mechanics of speech. It is a work of undeniable magic that dares to challenge the divine with domestic humor while simultaneously bearing the profound weight of human existence. Her inescapable message insists that any dialogue with eternity must eventually yield to the urgent biology of the speaker, tethering the vast exigencies of consciousness to a song we can physically experience.
Leave a comment